Should they not warn against unacceptible incidents which have been reported? If they have neglected certain responsibilities, hould they neglect all? But what you really want is for the UOHC to roll over and (play)[be] dead. But in that case your complaint isn't about this because this particular action is indeed correct and called for.
One day the lovely people in stamford hill from the union will realise that : On one side covering up the most serious abuse but preaching extreme znious at the same time! Ignoring the wishes of the frum kehilah in GG Ignoring all the local Rabonim Paskening and retracting and retracting retractions Having one rule for SH and one for GG
Should they not warn against unacceptible incidents which have been reported? If they have neglected certain responsibilities, hould they neglect all? But what you really want is for the UOHC to roll over and (play)[be] dead. But in that case your complaint isn't about this because this particular action is indeed correct and called for.
ReplyDeleteOne day the lovely people in stamford hill from the union will realise that
ReplyDelete:
On one side covering up the most serious abuse but preaching extreme znious at the same time!
Ignoring the wishes of the frum kehilah in GG
Ignoring all the local Rabonim
Paskening and retracting and retracting retractions
Having one rule for SH and one for GG
MAKES us in GG think you SH'ers are NUTS